Contact

Contact

Professional Nutrition Coaching Contact

Email

info@insidediet.org

FAQ

Faq

General Questions

Our editorial process involves a multi-layered review of contemporary literature. We prioritize peer-reviewed journals and meta-analyses—the gold standard of clinical evidence—to ensure that every claim is supported by a consensus of data rather than isolated or anecdotal studie

Yes. While we keep a pulse on emerging trends, our core recommendations are derived from longitudinal research and high-quality clinical trials. We distinguish between "preliminary findings" and "established science" to provide you with a foundation that is both safe and sustainable

Each article concludes with an "Evidence into Action" summary. We translate complex physiological data into practical, incremental lifestyle adjustments, allowing you to bridge the gap between abstract academic research and your personal wellness goals.

The primary differentiator is empirical transparency. Fads often rely on marketing and "quick-fix" promises; we rely on data. We are not afraid to address the nuances and limitations of a study, providing you with a transparent view of what the science actually says, rather than what sounds most appealing.

Scientific literature consistently demonstrates that dietary diversity and nutritional balance are more sustainable for long-term health than restrictive, exclusionary protocols. By focusing on balance, we address the body’s requirement for a complete spectrum of micro and macronutrients, minimizing the risk of deficiencies often found in "fad" diets

Science is an evolving dialogue, and it is common to find contradictory data. When this occurs, we provide a comprehensive overview of the conflicting evidence, highlighting the sample sizes, methodology, and funding sources of the studies involved. Our goal is to give you the most objective perspective possible so you can make informed decisions.